Pages

Monday, September 19, 2011

Beat-up Vintage Contest #2

A while back I had a contest to give away a few vintage cards that had been put through the ringer.  That contest required research, time and luck.  This time around, it just requires a comment.  No plugging needed on your blog, just answer this question in your comment.

If you could debate another blogger/reader about which card you would want out of 2 cards, what would the 2 cards be?

Example:  "I'd want any 1964 topps common over any non-hit card from 2011 Topps"

Any answer is acceptable, but I'm hoping to get some good ideas for a future series where I would get 2 of you to actually do the debate on my blog.  So the more realistic the debate ideas, the better.

Oh, and I will be out of town until Thursday morning, and out of blogging range, so you can get one entry for each qualifying comment, 1 per day, for a max of 3 entries.  Random.org, blah blah.

So you want to see the prize????  They are 12 hammered vintagy cardboard pieces, complete with 9 HOF'ers!  Click the pics to see the truly beat up condition in all it's close up glory!



27 comments:

  1. I would take anything 2002 Bowman in nature over any 2011 non-hit of one of my favorite players.

    A little wordy, I admit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would take any 1961 Topps over any 2010 Topps.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would take any non-sport Allen and Ginter base card over any unlicensed/airbrushed/no-logo baseball base card.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I would take any 1968 Topps Game card over any 2011 Topp Attax game card.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would take any attractively designed unlicensed/airbrushed/no logo baseball card over any Bowman-branded base card.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would take any rookie card of an actual major leaguer over any "First Bowman Card" of a high school grad who I will likely never see again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i will take any 'game action' card over any 'posing with my bat and a phony baloney smile' any day.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Would I take a beat-up vintage Nolan Ryan (say, early 70's) with a rounded corner or two over a 2011 Topps diamond sparkle insert of Nolan Ryan in perfect shape? I'd be really hard to turn down some vintage... but it'd also be hard to turn down a great new card...

    ReplyDelete
  9. I would take any RC from the 60's & 70's over any current "prospect" RC

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would take any 1992 Topps Gold over any 1980s common.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Spankee stole mine!

    I would take any 2011 Topps Heritage base card over any 2010 Topps Heritage base card.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I would take any vintage birthyear set in any condition over trying to collect the topps SP's and gimmick cards

    ReplyDelete
  13. I would gladly add any '65 Topps to my collection before this year's stuff. I like the look of the '65s with the pennants.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I would take any oddball or minor league card over any regular issue card from the same year.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I'll take any Ozzie Smith over any Barry Larkin

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'll take any 1971 Topps card over any 2020 Topps Heritage card.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I will gladly take any card traded for over any card pulled from a pack.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I would take a common of a card I need for my collection over a star card I don't.

    Word verification: guilkepr. I think I've had that word before.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Give me 1956 Topps over anything from the 70s or 80s.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I'll take a Beat-up Vintage over a numbered insert parallel common.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'd take my 1987 Topps set that my dad collected for me (it's my birth year) over most non-Astros and HOF Vintge.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I would take any 90-91 Pro Set Hockey card over any 1989 Bowman baseball card.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I would take any common 76 Topps over any common 75 Topps

    ReplyDelete
  24. I would take any Blue Jays common card over any Yankees/Red Sox star card.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I would take any 1978 base card common over any 1977 base card common.

    ReplyDelete